After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures across Europe, fresh technologies have become reviving these types of systems. Out of lie detection tools analyzed at the border to a program for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being found in asylum applications. This article explores just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures happen to be conducted. This reveals just how asylum seekers will be transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and to keep up with unpredictable tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to browse through these systems and to pursue their legal right for coverage.
It also shows how these technologies will be embedded in refugee governance: They assist in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by simply hindering all of them from being able to view the stations of protection. It further states that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight into the disciplinary mechanisms of such technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal knowledge, the article states that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double result: whilst they assist to expedite the asylum process, they also make it difficult to get refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are simply positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions of non-governmental actors, and read review ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their conditions. Moreover, that they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.
